?

Log in

No account? Create an account
What I say? Who knows me? What I said? What I am? disturbing.org.uk Previous Previous Next Next
Corrosive Shame
Therapy for Life
kneeshooter
kneeshooter
Shall I pretend to be surprised?
9 lies or Lie to me
Comments
kneeshooter From: kneeshooter Date: November 24th, 2005 10:26 am (UTC) (Link)

Re: Well That's Lucky!

Did you see the article on BBC News Online this morning about polyandry in Nepal?
From: ikkleblacktruck Date: November 24th, 2005 11:08 am (UTC) (Link)

Re: Well That's Lucky!

I missed that, will go look :)
From: ikkleblacktruck Date: November 24th, 2005 11:12 am (UTC) (Link)

Re: Well That's Lucky!

Cool :) Can't say I fancy Nepal though. Is there a proper word for the male version of a harem?
From: curlwomble Date: November 24th, 2005 01:46 pm (UTC) (Link)

Re: Well That's Lucky!

I read that article and wondered "What about the women who don't get husbands?" Not because they should have husbands or anything, but in a society where marriage is the norm, what role do the spinsters play? It makes no evolutionary-competitive sense to heap the reproductive burden onto one woman. Unless as a means of population control, I suppose; the population will grow far more slowly with only 1/2-1/4 (roughly, estimated from the numbers mentioned in that article only) as many women (effectively, only one per prior-generation-mother) having children as ther would be in a predominantly monogamous society. I have a feeling that the arrangement virtually guarantees a very stable population with a preponderance of (labour-optimised) males (great for recruiting Gurkhas).

But what is the fate of the single woman? Or do they take the Chinese Option?
9 lies or Lie to me