From: kneeshooter	Date: November 14th, 2003 08:54 am (UTC)		(Link)

Do you have no shame? :-)

	From: xullrae	Date: November 14th, 2003 10:25 am (UTC)		(Link)

None whatsoever :-) Next time it'll be Kahlua, or maybe Malibu? Or how about calling your kids Dunkin' Donuts, Dunk for short?

OK, maybe I do need a new job.....

From: ikkleblacktruck	Date: November 15th, 2003 05:58 am (UTC)		(Link)

I really think Kahlua could work. It's certainly no worse than Romeo or Brooklyn.

	From: captainweasel	Date: November 14th, 2003 10:14 am (UTC)		(Link)

do you offer sponsorship?

	From: xullrae	Date: November 14th, 2003 10:23 am (UTC)		(Link)

Occasionally, depends on what for. As far as I know we don't sponsor people to name their kids this way :-)

	From: captainweasel	Date: November 14th, 2003 10:42 am (UTC)		(Link)

i think it'd be a growth market... though you'd have to have contracts and vet people first as they'd be a 'living representation of the brand' and have to conduct themselves accordingly.
cripes - if companies did this they'd be able to legally revoke peoples names!

From: ikkleblacktruck	Date: November 15th, 2003 05:59 am (UTC)		(Link)
Re: Hoorah!

It is.

For a cat!